Simple · Forever · Similar

10th September 2016

Foundation of the Catalan Association for Uncist Homœopathy, Visca l’Homeopatia! (Hooray for Homœopathy!).

In the spring and summer of 2016 the educated scholar, independent researcher and scientific physician who discovered iSiPS put some fellows in contact with each other in order to organize themselves into an Association teaching iSiPS and advocating the pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy cause.

This pioneering independent Association of beneficiaries of the Hahnemannian quality of Homœopathy was founded on 10th September 2016. It’s the first and the sole existing independent homœopathic Catalan patients’ Association ever since.

As independent Organization it distinguishes from ordinary homeopathic patients’ Associations by having no complicity in the policy of pervasive forces of biomedical capitalism. Neither in the homeopathic pharmaceutical industry, nor in the current biomedical paradigm, through its enantiopathic (‘contraria contrariis‘) dogma, and its pharmaceutical legislation in force. A legislation which is aimed at promoting pseudohomeopathy, beheaded of any scientific simpleness, to supplant Homœopathy “similia similibus“, and at promoting the so-called “integrative medicine”, so as to “annihilate” pure, pefectly simple Homœopathy “legally”.

In the light of iSiPS, guided and inspired by Hahnemann‘s original philosophical-scientific-medical seminal work, the Catalan Association for Unicist Homœopathy, Visca l’Homeopatia! (Hooray for Homœopathy!) has actively contributed to increase public awareness of the overall strategy to annihilate pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy developed by pervasive forces of biomedical capitalism. The sole reason is that pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy is curative, i.e., sanative, though non lucrative/non patentable! Moreover pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy challenges the alleged therapeutic “scientificty” of dominant enantiopatic (‘contraria contrariis‘) pharmacotherapeutic standards. Therefore it doesn’t interest biomedical-technocratic capitalism at all. Such a strategy is the pharmaceutical legislation in force and its oxymoronic and pseudoscientific clauses referring to “homeopathic medicines”!

Only in this way can the biomedical-technocratical capitalism manage to mantain itself in power in alliance with the Estates.

Disclosing such a strategy, the Catalan Association for Unicist Homœopathy, Visca l’Homeopatia! (Hooray for Homœopathy!) has been the only existing organization that has realized the great untruth that permits the biomedical-technocratical capitalism to implement its pseudotherapeutic, material, only transient palliative enantiopathic dogma in health systems.

March 2016

The Rectorate governing the University of Barcelona unschedules the master’s degree in Homœopathy.

At the beginning of March 2016 the Rectorate of the University of Barcelona (UB) unscheduled the Master programme in Homœopathy, that it was offering since year 2004 as a biannual continuing education for health postgraduates. The unfavourable opinion of the Dean of the UB Faculty of Medicine backed that decision, and, in an official press release, it was alleged that “Homœopathy lacks a scientific basis”.

It represented the most severe academic disqualification that Homœopathy had ever suffered in a western country. The media re-echoed profusely the news, and it had serious negative consequences for the social acceptance of Homœopatthy.

Such an academic unscheduling was another action of the Great Offensive against individualized therapeutic application of scientific simpleness, i.e., pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy, launched in August 2005. However, the most regretful thing is that it provided the most evident proof of the major knowledge and incomplete information gap existing in university education, in general, and in medical education and training, in particular. Namely, the lack of iSiPS awareness, of iSiPS knowledge, that biases graduates’ and postgraduates’ logic, reasoning and decision-making, and of which they are completely unaware,

Furthermore, such an academic decision was unscientific, because it failed in its epistemological duty to distinguish current pseudohomœopathy, beheaded of any scientific simpleness, from pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy, conceived and founded by Hahnemann as Technique (applied Science) of Healing every individual case of disease in a predictively certain, and maximally efficient manner.

Let’s remenber thar iSiPS is the generative force governing the likeness of single entitites, and their generative transformation. Furthermore, it’s the very foundadtion of all experience/knowledge/evidence. Moreover, it’s the firm basis, the primary source of every step of the scientific method, of predictive certainty, of operative efficiency, of reproducibility, of every simulation, of scientific simpleness,….

However, the real bad news was that the homœopathic community, i.e., homœopathic medical Associations and their associates, had not a scientific discourse that was able to explain the supreme scientificity of the Technique (applied Science) of Healing founded by Hahnemann plausibly. Why? Because homœopathic physicians’ medical education and trainig suffers from the same knowledge and incomplete information gap too!

Such an important event spurred the discoverer of ISIPS on to teach it, in order to fill in the major knowledge gap existing in university education.

He was well aware that the supreme scientificty of pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy can only be explained in the light of iSiPS successfully and for the first time!

At the beginning of 2013, after many years of linguistic and etymological studies to ascertain the primary meaning of the word ‘principle’, Joaquim Nabona, MD, an independent researcher found and unveiled something groundbreaking. Namely, the existence of an Iberian Rommany primary etymon spelled and written ‘presimelo‘, that means ‘beginning’; ‘principio‘ (in Spanish). Its uniquess lies in the fact that it contains the consonantal code [prsm] of simple, semper- (always, for always/for ever; sempitern), similar (‘semblant’/resemblant). Remind the phonetic equivalences [p≈b], [r≈l]. He realized that such a particular uniquess was a real discovery of something unknown, but groundbreaking and transcendent, that nobody didn’t have realized so far. It explained the true nature of the long searched basic, fundamental, ultimate principle (in singular) of existence for the first time!

Presimelo merges simple · forever · similar, one in another, in a whole! It means that a true principle, understood as a law of nature, an important rule, or a theory that something is based on, is simple, forever, similar. It unifies the so-called “principle of simplicity or parsimony” (Ockham) with the so-called “principle of similitude” definitely, forever! It gives birth to a new noun phrase, to a neologism, namely, inherent simpleness in the principle of similitude (iSiPS), simple · forever · similar! It was a true scientific discovery of impressive heuristic value!

We may now realize that iSiPS is the long-searched fundamental principle, firm basis, underlying the ubiquitous and universal phenomenon of analogy/likeness/similitude. It is the generative force governing the likeness of single entities!

Furthermore, this Iberian Rommany etymon not only teach us that we don’t have to speak of “principle of simplicity” and of “principle of similitude” separately any more, but also teach us that inherent simpleness in the principle of similitude (iSiPS) is the ‘presime-lo‘, namely, the supreme Law of the existence!

Moreover, iSiPS can explain the supreme scientificity of pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy successfully, and for the fist time! Here lies its paramount epistemological importance and transcendence!

This groundbreaking discovery marks the beginning of a positive revolution in university education, and in medical education and training for the good of the humanity!

At

P

W

August 2005, official launch of the Great Offensive against pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy.

The Lancet is a general medical journal that was founded in 1823. It declares that it is a world-leading source of clinical, public health, and global health knowledge. However, its 27th of August 2005 issue published the results of a meta-analysis comparing homoeopathy and allopathy. It stated that homoeopathy fares poorly (is unsuccesfull) when compared with allopathy. Expressing an opinion about “homeopathy’s lack of benefit”, an Editorial of that issue was entitled “The end of homoeopathy”!

The Lancet, Editorial, August 27, 2005

1. “Of what there is no experience, one can hardly give a certain reason” (St. Teresa of Avila, 1511-1582, M6 9,4). Pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy, the Technique (applied Science) of Healing individual cases of disease can only be judged clinically. It cann’t be judged theoretically, statistically. Every homœopathically treated case of disease can only be judged on its clinical outcome, on the result or effect on the individual.
2. Without the most minute individualisation, Homœopathy is not conceivable (Hahnemann). The studies chosen for such a meta-analysis were not representative of pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy in practice. None of the studies assessed individualised pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy, founded by Hahnemann, as Technique (applied Science) of Healing every individual case of disease in a predictively certain, and maximally efficient manner. The meta-analysis, as well as the Editorial in question failed to distinguish pseudohomeopathy form pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy. They aligned themselves with the pharmaceutical legislation in force, and its oxymoronic clauses referred to “homoeopathic medicines”. They foster pseudohomeopathy, beheaded of any scientific simpleness, in order to supplant pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy, and “to annihilate” it “legally”.
3. Both meta-analysis and Editorial, aligned themselves around the model of ‘decrowned’ human being of the hegemonic bio-medical paradigm. A human being’s model deprived of ‘crown’, i.e., of spirit, reduced to its bio-material dimension. From such a bio-material model can only result material therapueutic approaches to mutliple molecular targets. Although being in the era of photonic sciences, the authors of the meta-analysis and the Editor of The Lancet neglected the dynamic conception of the origin and essential nature of disesase, which aims to target the starting point of illness of every individual case of disease, in order to restore the integrity, and to optimize the efficiency of the sick’s untuned immune photohomœorhesis.
4. Such a meta-analysis, as well as the corresponding Editorial in question resulted from the usual graduates’ and postgraduates’ biased logic and reasoning. It is unable to acknowledge the high educational and scientific value of every individual case of (chronic) disease on the certain way of healing, and with a long follow-up, after a single photodynamic homœopathic simpleness, as sole therapeutic variable, and after the failure of other previous apparently well chosen ones.

These four objections confute the reliability of the above-mentioned meta-analysis and Editorial. Neglecting scientific simpleness, they were used for launching the Great Offensive against pure, perfectly simple Homopathy. In this way The Lancet revealed istself as a servile loudspeaker of pervasive forces of biomedical-technocratic capitalism in alliance with the States, aiming at annihilating pure, perfectly simple Homœopathy, for the sole reason, that it is not lucrative, patentable, but curative, sanative, health restoring!